Search
-
7Images
Regarding Agha Baygum Ashraf al-Hajiyah's salary, 1910
Documents include a confirmation letter from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the salary of Agha Baygum Khanum Ashraf al-Hajiyah, daughter of Ustad Shir Ja‘far Mi‘mar (architect) from Kashan, and wife of Muhammad Hasan Khan Mu‘azzam al-Dawlah; her power of attorney to Mirza ‘Ali Akbar Khan to represent and receive her salary; and her identity verification and salary form, which includes a note on dividing Ustad Shir Ja‘far's salary among inheritors
-
4Images
Regarding Sadiqah Khanum and ‘Azra Khanum's salaries, 1910
Documents include a confirmation letter from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the salaries of Sadiqah Khanum and ‘Azra Khanum, daughters of Muhammad Rahim Bayg, an employee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; power of attorney by Sadiqah Khanum and ‘Azra Khanum to Asad Allah Khan to represent and receive their salaries; and Sadiqah Khanum and ‘Azra Khanum's identity verification and salary forms
-
5Images
Regarding Sahib Sultan Khanum's salary, 1910
Documents include a confirmation letter from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the salary of Sahib Sultan Khanum, daughter of Lutf‘ali Khan (an immigrant from the Caucasus); testimony by Haji Mahdi Aqa about Sahib Sultan Khanum being alive; Sahib Sultan Khanum's power of attorney to Mashhadi Muhammad Aqa (merchant from Tabriz) to represent and receive her salary; and her identity verification and salary form
-
1Images
Copy of letter from head of Customs House to Mu‘azid al-Mulk, 1913
The writer discusses Fatimah Khanum's complaint regarding the shares of her son, ‘Inayat Allah Khan, of a few farms, and mentions sending Fatimah Khanum's complaint to the addressee before, as well as affairs of the Ottoman citizens. But, the addressee has not been responsive, and the author asks him to resolve the issues.
-
1Images
Letter from head of Customs House to Farid al-Mulk, 1912
Talks about issues related to the farms belonging to the heirs of Haj ‘Abd al-Rahim Vakil al-Dawlah, and mentions a settlement which indicates that these properties formerly owned by the late Umm al-Khaqan are now owned by Sardar Mu‘tazad; the properties rented by the late Mu‘in al-Ra‘aya and later Haji Mu‘addil, the attorney of ‘Inayat Allah Khan, had taken the properties from the heirs of the late Mu‘in al-Ra‘aya. The author complains to the addressee for not addressing these issues and asks him for an investigation and to give these properties back to the heir of the late Vakil al-Dawlah.